<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Extending LinqToXml for better XML interaction	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.robg3d.com/2010/07/extending-linqtoxml-for-better-xml-interaction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2010/07/extending-linqtoxml-for-better-xml-interaction/</link>
	<description>Blog of Rob Galanakis (@robgalanakis)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 03:57:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Galanakis		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2010/07/extending-linqtoxml-for-better-xml-interaction/#comment-1273</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Galanakis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 22:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=45#comment-1273</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.robg3d.com/2010/07/extending-linqtoxml-for-better-xml-interaction/#comment-1211&quot;&gt;Varuna Bamunusinghe&lt;/a&gt;.

I haven&#039;t but there are some discussions regarding its usage:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/856215/linq-to-xml-vs-dom
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/182976

We&#039;ve been expanding the use of this system over the past several weeks and, after some frustrating initial startup debugging, it has been well worth it.  The main &#039;bug&#039; was being caused by some deferred execution issues which we still haven&#039;t figured out (we have just been putting &#039;ToArray&#039; when querying one of the problematic IEnumerables).  I still need to get a good repro and further debug it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.robg3d.com/2010/07/extending-linqtoxml-for-better-xml-interaction/#comment-1211">Varuna Bamunusinghe</a>.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t but there are some discussions regarding its usage:<br />
<a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/856215/linq-to-xml-vs-dom" rel="nofollow ugc">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/856215/linq-to-xml-vs-dom</a><br />
<a href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/182976" rel="nofollow ugc">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/182976</a></p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been expanding the use of this system over the past several weeks and, after some frustrating initial startup debugging, it has been well worth it.  The main &#8216;bug&#8217; was being caused by some deferred execution issues which we still haven&#8217;t figured out (we have just been putting &#8216;ToArray&#8217; when querying one of the problematic IEnumerables).  I still need to get a good repro and further debug it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Varuna Bamunusinghe		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2010/07/extending-linqtoxml-for-better-xml-interaction/#comment-1211</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Varuna Bamunusinghe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 05:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=45#comment-1211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is a quite nice method to work with XML files. We&#039;ve been using LinqToXml in one of our project. But, without using LINQ functionality that much, we used XPath queries. 

It seems your method is lot easier to maintain and to work with. Btw, did you check performance against executing XPath queries?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a quite nice method to work with XML files. We&#8217;ve been using LinqToXml in one of our project. But, without using LINQ functionality that much, we used XPath queries. </p>
<p>It seems your method is lot easier to maintain and to work with. Btw, did you check performance against executing XPath queries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
