<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Including test files in coverage reports	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.robg3d.com/2012/08/including-test-files-in-coverage-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2012/08/including-test-files-in-coverage-reports/</link>
	<description>Blog of Rob Galanakis (@robgalanakis)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:12:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick Coghlan		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2012/08/including-test-files-in-coverage-reports/#comment-46285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Coghlan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2012 07:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=1003#comment-46285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s worth including them for the reasons you state: if particular tests aren&#039;t being executed, you want to know that directly rather than trying to decipher the cause of low coverage numbers in supposedly tested code.

It also helps you detect dead support code.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s worth including them for the reasons you state: if particular tests aren&#8217;t being executed, you want to know that directly rather than trying to decipher the cause of low coverage numbers in supposedly tested code.</p>
<p>It also helps you detect dead support code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
