<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The perils of bunch/bundle?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.robg3d.com/2013/08/the-perils-of-bunchbundle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2013/08/the-perils-of-bunchbundle/</link>
	<description>Blog of Rob Galanakis (@robgalanakis)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 23:14:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kristján		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2013/08/the-perils-of-bunchbundle/#comment-227854</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristján]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 23:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=1093#comment-227854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t quite understand the conundrum you were posing.
Regardless, I think bunches should be avoided if the keys are going to be arbitrary. I like to think of them as mini-class-instances.  But if you want a container, then use the proper syntax for a container (i.e. the dict syntax) since that conveys better the intent.

I should add that I also dislike named tuples, but for various slightly different different reasons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t quite understand the conundrum you were posing.<br />
Regardless, I think bunches should be avoided if the keys are going to be arbitrary. I like to think of them as mini-class-instances.  But if you want a container, then use the proper syntax for a container (i.e. the dict syntax) since that conveys better the intent.</p>
<p>I should add that I also dislike named tuples, but for various slightly different different reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
