<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Results are not the point?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/</link>
	<description>Blog of Rob Galanakis (@robgalanakis)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 16:12:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Results are not the point, followup - RobG3D		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-229496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Results are not the point, followup - RobG3D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 16:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=1417#comment-229496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] response to a previous post explaining the phrase &#8220;Results are not the point&#8220;, commenter RenRen Gabás [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] response to a previous post explaining the phrase &#8220;Results are not the point&#8220;, commenter RenRen Gabás [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ren² Gabás		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-229382</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ren² Gabás]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 07:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=1417#comment-229382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Both approaches have their own place. It&#039;s easy to see why Toyota/Lean works well with manufacturing and operations. Continuous service and operations needs continual improvements. However, there are times when you need to forget all about process and workflow in order to break new ground. I would place breakthroughs in research and product development right in the Danny category.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both approaches have their own place. It&#8217;s easy to see why Toyota/Lean works well with manufacturing and operations. Continuous service and operations needs continual improvements. However, there are times when you need to forget all about process and workflow in order to break new ground. I would place breakthroughs in research and product development right in the Danny category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mathew		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-228736</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mathew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 14:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=1417#comment-228736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Spot on with this write-up, I absolutely think this 
site needs far more attention. I&#039;ll probably be back again to see more, thanks for the information!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on with this write-up, I absolutely think this<br />
site needs far more attention. I&#8217;ll probably be back again to see more, thanks for the information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Galanakis		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-228571</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Galanakis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 02:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=1417#comment-228571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-228488&quot;&gt;Charles Palmer&lt;/a&gt;.

Interesting article, and a great blog! Subscribed. Thanks Charles!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-228488">Charles Palmer</a>.</p>
<p>Interesting article, and a great blog! Subscribed. Thanks Charles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charles Palmer		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-228488</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Palmer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 08:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=1417#comment-228488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Saw this and thought of the article.

http://bps-research-digest.blogspot.com/2014/04/a-self-fulfilling-fallacy.html

Just taking results at face value would lead to an incorrect conclusion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw this and thought of the article.</p>
<p><a href="http://bps-research-digest.blogspot.com/2014/04/a-self-fulfilling-fallacy.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://bps-research-digest.blogspot.com/2014/04/a-self-fulfilling-fallacy.html</a></p>
<p>Just taking results at face value would lead to an incorrect conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rob Galanakis		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-228479</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob Galanakis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 02:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=1417#comment-228479</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-228460&quot;&gt;Sinisa&lt;/a&gt;.

Well, I never thought of it that way, but you have quite a point! One of the tenets of Lean/Toyota Way is &quot;respect for people&quot;, but if you take that out, then yeah- you&#039;re spot on! :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-228460">Sinisa</a>.</p>
<p>Well, I never thought of it that way, but you have quite a point! One of the tenets of Lean/Toyota Way is &#8220;respect for people&#8221;, but if you take that out, then yeah- you&#8217;re spot on! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sinisa		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-228460</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sinisa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2014 18:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=1417#comment-228460</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The reality of course is that any publisher would likely buy Danny out, keep milking him until he dries out at which point they’ll dump him for an already worked in Jess who is at this point producing reliable success consistently. They will naturally repeat the whole process with Jess if he ever happens to burn out himself and produce anything less than a complete success.
And that there is the result of their continuously improving money making process.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reality of course is that any publisher would likely buy Danny out, keep milking him until he dries out at which point they’ll dump him for an already worked in Jess who is at this point producing reliable success consistently. They will naturally repeat the whole process with Jess if he ever happens to burn out himself and produce anything less than a complete success.<br />
And that there is the result of their continuously improving money making process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Kist		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-228429</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Kist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2014 08:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=1417#comment-228429</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[seems the phrase is just strangely worded. Overall results do count as you will have a hard time running a company that doesn&#039;t eventually deliver. But with a process that can be improved, based on previous results, it is just more likely that your company will eventually deliver, vs. a shop that leaves things to pure chance. It&#039;s basically what the CMM too tells you you should do]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems the phrase is just strangely worded. Overall results do count as you will have a hard time running a company that doesn&#8217;t eventually deliver. But with a process that can be improved, based on previous results, it is just more likely that your company will eventually deliver, vs. a shop that leaves things to pure chance. It&#8217;s basically what the CMM too tells you you should do</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dmitry		</title>
		<link>https://www.robg3d.com/2014/04/results-are-not-the-point/#comment-228412</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dmitry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 14:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.robg3d.com/?p=1417#comment-228412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you, Rob. Another excellent post.

I can compare this explanation to explanation of the phrase &quot;Good artists copy, great artists steal&quot; in terms of being simple but yet not that obvious and misinterpreted a lot. I have seen number of explanations, but they don&#039;t reveal the idea as far as I can see it: 

 - if you just copy, original author is still known and has a credit for what he has done before you
 - when you steal, original author is completely forgotten and you have all the credits on your own

MS did have smartphones with touch screen and tons of apps years before first iPhone arrivied. But who cares about it now?.. That what the real stealing is.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Rob. Another excellent post.</p>
<p>I can compare this explanation to explanation of the phrase &#8220;Good artists copy, great artists steal&#8221; in terms of being simple but yet not that obvious and misinterpreted a lot. I have seen number of explanations, but they don&#8217;t reveal the idea as far as I can see it: </p>
<p> &#8211; if you just copy, original author is still known and has a credit for what he has done before you<br />
 &#8211; when you steal, original author is completely forgotten and you have all the credits on your own</p>
<p>MS did have smartphones with touch screen and tons of apps years before first iPhone arrivied. But who cares about it now?.. That what the real stealing is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
